Skip to content

409A safe harbor and valuation requirements: what the regulation says

Published October 25, 2026 · Rules checked against SBA and IRS sources as of October 2026

Short answer

Treasury Regulation 1.409A-1(b)(5)(iv)(B)(2) lists three valuation methods that are presumed reasonable for private company stock: (i) an independent appraisal meeting the Section 401(a)(28)(C) requirements, as of a date no more than 12 months before the grant; (ii) a formula price used consistently under a binding nonlapse restriction; and (iii) for illiquid start-ups, a written valuation by a qualified person. The IRS can rebut a presumption only by showing the method or its application was grossly unreasonable.

PresumptionConditions (summarized from the regulation)Typical user
(i) Independent appraisalMeets Section 401(a)(28)(C) requirements; valuation date no more than 12 months before the grantMost venture-backed and growth companies
(ii) Binding formulaFormula that would be FMV under a nonlapse restriction, used consistently for transfers to the issuer or 10%+ holders (other than an arm's-length sale of substantially all stock)Companies with formula buy-sell pricing
(iii) Illiquid start-upWritten report reflecting the (B)(1) factors; company has no material trade or business conducted for 10+ years; no traded equity; stock not subject to put/call (with exceptions); no change in control expected within 90 days or IPO within 180 days; qualified preparerEarly-stage companies
What the safe harbor changes No presumptionFacts-and-circumstances test;company defends reasonableness Presumption appliesIRS must show method orapplication grossly unreasonable
Summary of 1.409A-1(b)(5)(iv)(B)(2). Not tax advice.

Two traps

See how often to update.

The baseline requirement: a reasonable method

For private company stock, Treasury Regulation 1.409A-1(b)(5)(iv)(B)(1) requires fair market value to be determined by "the reasonable application of a reasonable valuation method", judged on the facts as of the valuation date. It lists factors to consider, says a method isn't reasonable if it ignores available material information, and says a prior value isn't reasonable if it's more than 12 months old or misses later material information. Separate presumptions in (B)(2) make certain methods presumptively reasonable.

The factors listed in (B)(1)

As applicable, a reasonable method considers:

Three tests Considers thelisted factors All materialinformation No more than12 months old Paraphrased from 1.409A-1(b)(5)(iv)(B)(1). Not tax advice.
Fail any one and the value is not reasonable under the regulation.

Where the presumptions come in

Paragraph (B)(2) makes three methods presumptively reasonable: an independent appraisal no more than 12 months before the grant, a consistently used binding formula, and a qualified written valuation for an illiquid start-up. See the safe harbor guide.

What fair market value means under 409A

Under Section 409A, fair market value is the value of the stock underlying an option on the grant date, which sets the minimum exercise price. For public companies, the regulation allows prices from actual trades, such as the closing price. For private companies, it means a value determined by the reasonable application of a reasonable valuation method. In practice the 409A value is for common stock, which is usually worth less than the preferred stock investors buy.

CompanyHow FMV is set (summary)
Public (readily tradable)Last sale before or first after grant, closing price on the trading day before or of grant, average of high and low, or other reasonable method using actual trades; averaging within 30 days allowed if fixed in advance
PrivateReasonable application of a reasonable valuation method considering the listed factors; presumptions available
Two routes to FMV Public companyUse actual trading prices((b)(5)(iv)(A)) Private companyReasonable valuation method((b)(5)(iv)(B))
Summarized from 1.409A-1. Not tax advice.

Strike price: never below fair market value

For a nonstatutory stock option to avoid being treated as deferred compensation under Section 409A, the regulation requires that the exercise price may never be less than the fair market value of the underlying stock on the date the option is granted, and that the number of shares is fixed on the grant date. That's why private companies set strike prices from a current 409A valuation. A discounted option risks immediate taxation plus an additional 20% tax for the holder.

The line that matters Strike at or above FMV on grant date 409A FMV Below FMV: deferred compensation risk
From 1.409A-1(b)(5)(i)(A). Not tax advice.

Illustration, not a real company. 409A FMV of common: $0.40 per share, valuation date March 1. Board grants options on June 15 with no material events since.

StrikeResult
$0.40At FMV: fine if the valuation is still reasonable on June 15
$0.50Above FMV: allowed
$0.30Below FMV: 409A problem

If a term sheet had been signed on June 1, the March value might no longer reflect material information, and a new valuation would be needed before the grant.

See when to refresh.

LLCs, partnerships and profits interests

Section 409A's stock right exemption is written around "service recipient stock", which the regulation defines as common stock of a corporation; other entities' interests count only to the extent the IRS designates in published guidance, and the regulation's section on arrangements between partnerships and partners is marked "[Reserved]". So an LLC taxed as a partnership is in less settled territory. Many LLCs use profits interests instead of options, which raise their own valuation questions. Get tax counsel before granting.

EntityWhat the regulation saysPractical note
C or S corporationCommon stock can be service recipient stockStandard 409A option rules apply
Non-corporate entityInterests count only as designated in IRS published guidance ((b)(5)(iii)(D))Check current guidance with counsel
Partnership-partner arrangements(b)(7) is "[Reserved]"Less settled; profits interests common
Profits interest threshold (conceptual) Value at grant growth shared threshold At grantLater
A valuation at grant sets the threshold. Conceptual; not tax advice.

This is general information, not tax advice. See 409A basics.

Choosing which presumption to rely on

Most venture-backed companies rely on the independent appraisal presumption, because it's available at any stage and is the most widely understood by auditors and acquirers. The illiquid start-up presumption can suit very early companies, but its conditions are narrower: no material trade or business conducted for 10 years or more, no traded equity, no put or call rights over the stock beyond the regulation's exceptions, no change in control expected within 90 days or IPO within 180 days, and a preparer the company reasonably determines is qualified, generally with at least five years of relevant experience. The binding formula presumption is rare outside companies whose buy-sell arrangements already fix a formula price used consistently for transfers. Whichever you choose, document why it applies at each grant date.

What can still go wrong with a presumption

A presumption protects the method, not a careless application. The IRS can rebut it by showing the valuation method or its application was grossly unreasonable. More commonly, companies lose the benefit by using a valuation past 12 months, granting after a material event the valuation didn't reflect, or pricing grants below the concluded value. Keep the report, the board's adoption of it, and the grant records together.

None of this is tax advice. Section 409A failures fall on the option holder as well as the company, so it is worth getting the documentation right before the first grant rather than after an audit or an acquirer's diligence questions it.

Related reading: the 409A pillar guide on this site covers methods and how funding rounds feed the value.

Common questions

What does "presumed reasonable" buy you?

It shifts the burden: the IRS must show the valuation was grossly unreasonable, rather than the company proving it was reasonable.

Who qualifies to do a start-up valuation under (iii)?

A person the company reasonably determines is qualified based on significant knowledge, experience, education or training; significant experience generally means at least five years of relevant experience.

When can't a start-up use presumption (iii)?

If a change in control event is reasonably anticipated within 90 days, or an IPO within 180 days, after the action the valuation applies to.

Is an independent appraisal required?

No. The regulation requires a reasonable method; an independent appraisal is one of the presumptions that makes reasonableness easier to defend.

Does consistent use of a method help?

Yes. The regulation says consistent use of a method for other purposes, including non-compensation purposes, supports reasonableness.

Related guides

Sources

  1. 26 CFR 1.409A-1(b)(5)(iv)(B) (eCFR)
  2. 26 U.S.C. 409A (Cornell LII)
  3. 26 CFR 20.2031-1(b): general fair market value definition (eCFR)

This guide explains rules and practice in plain English. It isn't legal, tax or credit advice, and SBA and IRS rules change. Check the current SOP, regulations and your lender's requirements before you rely on anything here. Examples with made-up businesses are illustrations, not real deals.